I retired my old Xanga blog today, and so I spent some time archiving all my old posts there, which of course led to my re-reading them all and losing myself in a little nostalgia. I didn't realize it, but I started blogging at the same time I first moved to New York City. It seems like so long ago now. I can so clearly see how upbeat and excited I was when I arrived, how the posts got progressively more disgruntled regarding work and east-coast weather, how I struggled to teach myself how to write fiction through a combination of night classes and writer groups, how I searched so hard for meaning and purpose in life with the fundraising, the volunteer work, the mentoring. I re-read the comments, too, and I felt renewed gratitude for the support of my readers throughout the years. Thank you again so very, very much for your insights, your encouragement, and your hilarious observations.
I realize I've been remiss in my blogging for far too long. Even those silly, short posts I used to make now seem precious to me, because they provide sneak peeks into my past that would otherwise be written off as trivial and forgotten. But taken in summation, they truly do give me a more informed perspective on my own evolution over the past four years. It's interesting to see which things I chose to write about, as well, since some of the most significant events of my life in that time period are only alluded to in the vaguest terms, being too personal for the mass Internet audience. Of course, those things I can remember without needing posts to remind me, but the passage of time colors how I look back on them.
I'll write a little about current events now, in the spirit of preserving the minutia of the day, knowing I'll look back on this someday and go, "Oh, yeah! I forgot about that! Good times..."
I went to see the Beastie Boys this past Thursday at the McCarren Park Pool for their first-ever concert in Brooklyn. The woman searching my bag outside the concert venue pulled out my umbrella and said, "The Beastie Boys don't want umbrellas in there. You can go back to your car and leave it there if you want. Or you can add it to the pile." She gestured to a growing mound of umbrellas at her feet that were left by their owners to be retrieved later - aka the Pile of Delusional Hope. Having bought my umbrella at a Roots store in Banff, British Columbia, only a couple of months ago, I wasn't eager to abandon it there. Of course, like most New Yorkers, I didn't have a car in which to stash it, either. I backtracked into McCarren Park, found a suitably branchy pine tree, and stuck my umbrella in the middle of it. It was still there when I got back, and despite a few threatening sprinkles that cleared up by the time the band came out, I hadn't needed it anyway.
The concert itself was enjoyable but not nearly as crazy as I had expected. It was an outdoor concert, so the noise never got unbearably loud, and the crowd was surprisingly sedate. There was no opening band and no encore. DJ Run made a cameo appearance between songs but just waved hello and then watched from the side of the stage. I did like the giant guitar-pick-shaped video screens that hung over the stage and the Warsaw Special I bought from one of the food vendors' tents. A plateful of pierogis, kielbasa, hunter's stew, applesauce, and rye bread for $6.00 make for some of the cheapest eats I've had in the city, and probably some of the most hygienically prepared based on what I saw of the outdoor cook-out-style facilities. I got a souvenier t-shirt to mark the occasion, and everyone exited afterwards in a remarkable orderly fashion. I got home at a reasonable time and would have gotten enough sleep if it hadn't been for the arrival of Eclipse in the mail that day. In short, it was a very good Thursday.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Inspired
I just finished reading Eclipse by Stephanie Meyer, and hoo boy, can that woman write a page-turner! I'm pretty sure I'll be useless for the rest of the day, what with the sleep-deprivation and tired eyes, and a little part inside of me wonders whether I would have been able to stretch out my enjoyment if I'd only paced myself over the course of a week instead of indulging in a marathon page-devouring session. But I think overall, it was worth it. Besides, I would have been unbearable to be around socially in the meantime, always impatient to slip away and read a few more chapters. =)
Of course, after I had taken the requisite time to "be human" after finishing Eclipse by eating, showering, etc., I began to reflect on what makes her writing so enjoyable. Meyer has a perfect grasp of compelling romance - ecstatic, unbelievable happiness entwined inextricably with a longing so powerful it threatens to break apart a person's insides. It is simultaneously satisfying and painful to read, perhaps satisfying because it is a painful, and truthful, depiction of the most desperate, devoted kind of love. Love as a drug seems the most apt analogy, which Meyer's heroine (aka Edward's heroin - ha!) empathizes with only too well.
I wonder how much of the novel's success, or indeed that of any in the Twilight series, has to do with her choice to write in the first person. I certainly felt connected with the main character Bella, and although she is very different from me, I cared about her and was able to understand her motivations. I think part of that was Meyer's set-up of Bella as an ordinary girl living in (initially) ordinary circumstances. It's a common enough formula in modern literature, and it makes the writer's job of creating a character to which readers can relate so much easier than one coming from a vastly different background.
The main character in the story I am working on is almost the complete opposite of Bella, situation-wise. I know my fabulous test readers have struggled to relate to her, and I admit that I've been struggling myself. Now I'm wondering whether switching to the first person would help with that problem. Normally, I'm more comfortable writing in third person, or even second person. First person feels a bit introspective and self-indulgent to me, which is probably why I don't blog as often as I might! A blog in third person would probably strike people as a bit pretentious. =) But for developing a main character, it's hard to beat a first-person perspective. The writer can reveal the character's inner world as well as his or her unique view of reality. When you get to know someone that intimately, it's hard not to relate just a little, no matter how disparate the backgrounds between character and reader.
So, after all that introspective and self-indulgent blathering, I think I will try a little experiment and rewrite a chapter of my story in first person. It's already in extremely close third-person perspective, so it probably won't be much of a stretch, and regardless of the ultimate decision, it should be a beneficial exercise. Besides, as is often said, you never know if it works until you try it.
Of course, after I had taken the requisite time to "be human" after finishing Eclipse by eating, showering, etc., I began to reflect on what makes her writing so enjoyable. Meyer has a perfect grasp of compelling romance - ecstatic, unbelievable happiness entwined inextricably with a longing so powerful it threatens to break apart a person's insides. It is simultaneously satisfying and painful to read, perhaps satisfying because it is a painful, and truthful, depiction of the most desperate, devoted kind of love. Love as a drug seems the most apt analogy, which Meyer's heroine (aka Edward's heroin - ha!) empathizes with only too well.
I wonder how much of the novel's success, or indeed that of any in the Twilight series, has to do with her choice to write in the first person. I certainly felt connected with the main character Bella, and although she is very different from me, I cared about her and was able to understand her motivations. I think part of that was Meyer's set-up of Bella as an ordinary girl living in (initially) ordinary circumstances. It's a common enough formula in modern literature, and it makes the writer's job of creating a character to which readers can relate so much easier than one coming from a vastly different background.
The main character in the story I am working on is almost the complete opposite of Bella, situation-wise. I know my fabulous test readers have struggled to relate to her, and I admit that I've been struggling myself. Now I'm wondering whether switching to the first person would help with that problem. Normally, I'm more comfortable writing in third person, or even second person. First person feels a bit introspective and self-indulgent to me, which is probably why I don't blog as often as I might! A blog in third person would probably strike people as a bit pretentious. =) But for developing a main character, it's hard to beat a first-person perspective. The writer can reveal the character's inner world as well as his or her unique view of reality. When you get to know someone that intimately, it's hard not to relate just a little, no matter how disparate the backgrounds between character and reader.
So, after all that introspective and self-indulgent blathering, I think I will try a little experiment and rewrite a chapter of my story in first person. It's already in extremely close third-person perspective, so it probably won't be much of a stretch, and regardless of the ultimate decision, it should be a beneficial exercise. Besides, as is often said, you never know if it works until you try it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)